UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBIN WILLATS, JOHN EMSON, SIDNEY FISHER, JEAN-
BERNARD DIDIER, ALAN DIXON, STEPHEN DRYSDALE, NIGEL
SPURR, and GURBINDER KALSI
____________
Appeal 2006-2295
Application 10/215,274
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: October 23, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and MARC
S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1-22. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We affirm-in-part.
Appellants’ claimed invention relates to an access control method and
system for a vehicle having at least two closures and a receiver. The
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013