Ex Parte Porter et al - Page 2



                Appeal 2006-2299                                                                               
                Application 10/615,671                                                                         

                first twist, and a resinous coating on the warp and weft yarns having a                        
                coating weight distribution ratio of less than 2.0:1.  Independent claim 1 is                  
                illustrative and reads as follows:                                                             
                      1. A fabric reinforcement useful in reinforcing an alkaline matrix                       
                comprising:                                                                                    
                             (a) a plurality of warp yarns having a first twist (turns/inch);                  
                             (b) a plurality of weft yarns having a second twist which is                      
                greater than said first twist; and                                                             
                             (c) a resinous coating disposed over a substantial portion of said                
                warp and weft yarns after they have been assembled or laid together, such as                   
                to produce a coating weight distribution ratio (WPUcd/WPUmd) of less than                      
                about 2.0:1, before said fabric reinforcement is embedded within, or                           
                adhesively or mechanically bonded to said alkaline matrix.                                     
                      The references set forth below are relied upon by the Examiner as                        
                evidence of anticipation and obviousness:                                                      
                Kobayashi US 4,460,633 Jul. 17, 1984                                                           
                Endo US 4,581,275 Apr. 8, 1986                                                                 
                Wu US 5,038,555 Aug. 13, 1991                                                                  
                      Claims 1-5, 7, 9, 22, and 25-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                    
                as being anticipated by, or alternatively under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                    
                obvious over, Kobayashi.                                                                       
                      Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable                      
                over Kobayashi in view of Endo, and claims 6, 8, and 24 are                                    
                correspondingly rejected over these references and further in view of Wu.                      
                      These rejections cannot be sustained.                                                    
                                                      2                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013