Ex Parte Anderfaas - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                      Ex parte ERIC N. ANDERFAAS                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2483                                                 
                                           Application 10/371,785                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                          Decided: March 16, 2007                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and JENNIFER                                      
                D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                        
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1-52, which are all                    
                of the pending claims.                                                                        
                                             THE INVENTION                                                    
                      The Appellant claims a rotary damper and a method for damping                           
                rotary movement.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013