The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ICHIRO MASE,
YASUYUKI NAKAMURA,
YUICHI SHIMAKAWA,
MAYUMI KOSAKA and
YOSHIMI KUBO
____________
Appeal 2006-2489
Application 09/900,771
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 2, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and LINDA M.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1
and 3-20. Because Appellants’ appeal meets the requirements of 35 U.S.C.
§ 134(a), we have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013