Ex Parte Hengstenberg - Page 4



             Appeal No. 2006-2529                                                                                
             Application No. 10/428,792                                                                          

                                               CONCLUSION                                                        
                   For the foregoing reasons, it is our finding of fact that claim 1 is anticipated              
             by Laney.                                                                                           
                                                    ORDER                                                        
             Since all claims on appeal fall with claim 1, we affirm the rejections of claims 1-12               
             under 35 U.S.C.  § 102.                                                                             























                                                       4                                                         



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013