onecle

Ex Parte Holden - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                    
          not written for publication in and is not binding precedent of                    
          the Board.                                                                        

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                            
                                        ___________                                         
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                               
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                       
                                        ___________                                         
                               Ex parte PERRIANN M. HOLDEN                                  
                                        ___________                                         
                                   Appeal No. 2006-2531                                     
                               Application No. 09/910,641                                   
                                  Technology Center 3700                                    
                                        ___________                                         
                                         ON BRIEF                                           
                                        ___________                                         
          Before OWENS, CRAWFORD and FETTING, Administrative Patent                         
          Judges.                                                                           
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                               


                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
                This appeal is from a rejection of claims 21-23, 27, 29                     
          and 32.  Claims 2-4, 7-9, 12-20, 34, 42, 43, 45 and 46 stand                      
          withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as claiming a                        
          nonelected invention.  Claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11, 24-26, 28, 30,                     
          31, 33, 35-41 and 44 have been canceled.                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013