onecle

Ex Parte Petersen - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                        
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                         Ex parte CYLE D. PETERSEN                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal 2006-2599                                                    
                                             Application 10/199,986                                                 
                                            Technology Center 2800                                                  
                                                  ____________                                                      
                                           Decided: February 27, 2007                                               
                                                  ____________                                                      

                 Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, and                                                   
                 ALLEN R. MACDONALD,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       Pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  134, Appellant has appealed to the Board                             
                 from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1 through 18.                                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013