The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DID-MIN SHIH, CHUN-CHIEH CHEN, JYHFONG LIN
and PEIR-WEIR CHEN
____________
Appeal 2006-2624
Application 10/223,246
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: February 27, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134, Appellants have appealed to the Board
from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 23 and 25.
Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced below:
1. A radio communication device, comprising:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013