Appeal 2006-2637
Application 10/178,878
manifold limitations of independent claim1, from which claims 4 and 5
depend. In light of our determinations above regarding the lack of a
disclosure of the here claimed manifold features by Murkejee, it follows that
we shall also reverse the Examiner’s obviousness rejection of claims 4 and
5, on this record.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-3, 6-9, and 12-31
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Mukerjee and to reject
claims 4 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Mukerjee in view of Elangovan is reversed.
REVERSED
sld/ls
DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
M/C 480-410-202
P.O. BOX 5052
TROY, MI 48007
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013