Ex Parte Lipps et al - Page 1



                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                              
                                          is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                     __________                                                         
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
                             Ex parte BINIE V. LIPPS and FREDERICK W. LIPPS                                             
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                 Appeal 2006-2644                                                       
                                               Application 10/047,945                                                   
                                              Technology Center 1600                                                    
                                                     __________                                                         
                                               Decided: July 31, 2007                                                   
                                                     __________                                                         
                 Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M.                                                   
                 LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                 GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   


                                 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                      
                        Appellants have requested rehearing (reconsideration) of the decision                           
                 entered December 21, 2006.  That decision affirmed the Examiner’s                                      
                 rejection of claims 9-18 for nonenablement.  We have considered                                        
                 Appellants’ arguments but decline to change the disposition of the claims in                           
                 the previous decision.  The request for rehearing is denied.                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013