Appeals 2006-2874 and 2006-2747
Applications 08/544,212 and 09/287,664
Patent 5,401,305
1 They do not call for the presence of silicon oxide.
2 In our view, these claims stand or fall with claim 33.
3
4 Claims 53-55 (Appeal 2006-2684)
5 Claims 53-55 depend from claim 39 and are directed to an article
6 comprising a film on a substrate.
7 They do not call for the presence of silicon oxide.
8 In our view, these claims stand or fall with claim 39.
9
10 Claims 56-57 (Appeal 2006-2684)
11 Claims 56-57 are directed to films comprising silicon oxide, a metal
12 oxide and an oxide of an accelerant.
13 The silicon oxide is not limited to the silicon oxides of application
14 original claim 11.
15 In our view, claims 56-57 stand or fall with claim 37.
16
17 Claims 58-59 (Appeal 2006-2684)
18 Claim 58 calls for a film and reads as follows:
19 A film comprising the deposition product of
20 monobutyltin trichloride, tetraethyl orthosilicate,
21 and triethyl phosphite.
22
23 Claim 59 calls for a film and reads as follows:
24 A film comprising the deposition product of
25 monobutyltin trichloride, tetraethyl orthosilicate,
26 triethyl phosphite and triethyl borate.
27
28 Claim 58 is a film made from the gaseous composition of claim 27 of
29 the patent, which reads:
15
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013