onecle

Ex Parte Somack et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                      
                           for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                       Ex parte RALPH SOMACK and                                                  
                                                  GARY LIM                                                        
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                               Appeal 2006-2686                                                   
                                            Application 09/994,495                                                
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                          Decided:  January 19, 2007                                              
                                                 ____________                                                     

                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A.                                              
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                              
                WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                       This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final                          
                rejection of claims 1 through 19, 48, and 49.  Claims 20-47 and 51-57 are                         
                the only other claims pending in this application and stand withdrawn from                        








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013