The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MATT CLARK, SHANE MEYER, CHRIS ROMANZIN,
and BRIAN C. ROUNDTREE
__________
Appeal No. 2006-2700
Application No. 10/705,456
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before BARRY, SAADAT, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 3 through 21, all of which are pending
in this application. Claims 18 through 21 have been objected to
by the Examiner as being dependent over rejected base claims, but
would otherwise be allowable if rewritten in independent form to
include the limitations of the base claims and any other
intervening claims. Claims 1 and 2 have been canceled by
Appellants.
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013