Ex Parte AbuSamra et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2006-2712                                                                            
               Application 10/745,095                                                                      
               have been cancelled.  We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35                   
               U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).                                                                       
                      The claims are directed to normally open clutch assembly controllable                
               to modify rotational speed required for actuation.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                
                            1.   A normally open clutch assembly comprising:                               
                            a clutch cover attachable to a rotatable input member;                         
                            a friction disk;                                                               
                            a pressure plate rotatable with said clutch cover and movable                  
                      axially between a clamped position engaging said friction disk and an                
                      open position;                                                                       
                            a plurality of weights movable responsive to rotation of said                  
                      normally open clutch assembly to move said pressure plate between                    
                      said clamped position and said open position; and                                    
                            a front plate and a back plate defining a radial space within                  
                      which said plurality of weights move, said front plate movable to                    
                      adjust a rotational speed at which said pressure plate moves to said                 
                      clamped position.                                                                    
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference to show                     
               unpatentability:                                                                            
                      Markyvech         US 2002/0137596 A1              Sep. 26, 2002                      
                      The rejections as presented by the Examiner are as follows:                          
            1.        Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated                
               by Markyvech.                                                                               
                      Appellants contend that there is no disclosure in Markyvech that                     
               provides for adjustment of the engine rotational speed at which the clutch                  
               engages.                                                                                    

                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013