The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JIN-SHAN WANG,
HUIJUAN CHEN and
STEVEN EVANS
____________
Appeal 2006-2739
Application 09/918,584
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: February 23, 2007
____________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, and
10-18 and the Examiner’s objection to claims 11-13. For the reasons
explained below, our jurisdiction extends only to the rejection of claims 1,
and 10-18. See 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) (2006).
With respect to the rejection, we reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013