onecle

Ex Parte Schmieding et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               ____________                                                 
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                               ____________                                                 
                        Ex parte DIRK SCHMIEDING and CHRISTA WELLMANN                                       
                                               ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal No. 2006-2766                                             
                                         Application No. 10/635,174                                         
                                                  TC: 2800                                                  
                                               ____________                                                 
                                          Decided: March 14, 2007                                           
                                               ____________                                                 
            Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, LANCE LEONARD BARRY, and MAHSHID D.                                  
            SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
            SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) from the Examiner’s                
            final rejection of claims 2, 8, 10, and 11.  Claim 1 has been canceled while claim 9            
            is allowed and claims 3-7 remain objected to as being dependent upon a rejected                 
            base claim but otherwise allowable.                                                             
                   We reverse.                                                                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013