onecle

Ex Parte Stockman et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                                  Ex parte STEPHEN A. STOCKMAN,                                             
                                         SERGE L. RUDAZ, and                                                
                                            MIRA S. MISRA                                                   
                                             _____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2006-2769                                                
                                          Application 09/846,980                                            
                                         Technology Center 1700                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  April 5, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  
               Before CHUNG K. PAK, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and                                                    
               CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims                       
               1 and 3 through 60, all of the claims pending in the above-identified                        
               application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 and 134.                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013