Ex Parte Reitz et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                         
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                          Ex parte HARIKLIA DRIS REITZ, SUJEET KUMAR,                                       
                      XIANGXIN BI, NOBUYUKI KAMBE, RONALD J. MOSSO,                                         
                                        and JAMES T. GARDNER                                                
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2006-2776                                                
                                          Application 09/970,279                                            
                                          Technology Center 1700                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided:  June 14, 2007                                           
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                  
               PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner’s refusal                   
               to allow claims 21-37, the only claims that remain pending in this                           
               application.  Claims of the application have been at least twice rejected.  We               
               have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6 (2006).                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013