Appeal 2006-2776
Application 09/970,279
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 21, 24, 28-31, 34 and 35
under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Lemelson; to reject claims
36 and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lemelson; to
reject claims 22, 23, 25, 26, 32, and 33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Lemelson in view of Pratsinis; and to reject claim 27
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lemelson in view Rice
is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
clj
Dardi & Associates, PLLC
220 S. 6th St.
Suite 2000, U.S. Bank Plaza
Minneapolis, MN 55402
21
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Last modified: September 9, 2013