The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SUNGMIN CHO, PETER REIMER, and VINCENT SEIDL
____________
Appeal 2006-2792
Application 10/198,688
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: January 24, 2007
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ROBERT E. NAPPI and LINDA E.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 USC § 134(a) from the Examiner's
final rejection of claims 1-9, 11-14, 16-18, and 34, all of the claims pending in the
application. Claims 10, 15, and 19-33 have been canceled.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013