The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JONATHON BALBAUGH and RANDAL TEDERS
________________
Appeal 2006-2812
Application 10/149,490
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: July 30, 2007
________________
Before MICHAEL R. FLEMING, Chief Administrative Patent Judge;
EDWARD C. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge;
FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge; and
CHUNG K. PAK and THOMAS A. WALTZ; Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request reconsideration of our Decision of
October 31, 2006 wherein we sustained the Examiner’s rejections of the
appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
We have reviewed our decision in light of the arguments presented by
Appellants in the Request. However, we are not persuaded by Appellants’
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013