onecle

Ex Parte Banerjee et al - Page 1


                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                       Ex parte SUKANTA BANERJEE, CECILIA GEORGESCU,                                          
                                            and MICHAEL SEUL                                                  
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2854                                                 
                                           Application 10/348,165                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                         Decided: March 28, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                   
                JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           
                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                                            Statement of the Case                                             
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from a final rejection of                       
                claims 1, 3-5, 7, 9-30, and 43-44.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.                      
                 6.1                                                                                         
                      Appellants’ invention relates to generating a plurality of microparticle                
                populations of different dye concentrations where dye is loaded into polymer                  
                                                                                                             
                1 In rendering this decision we have considered the Appellants’ submissions                   
                filed on March 6, 2006, March 8, 2006 and April 19, 2006.                                     



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013