onecle

Ex Parte Baker et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                              
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                         ____________                                                             
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         ____________                                                             
                           Ex parte KEVIN P. BAKER, DAVID BOTSTEIN, LUC DESNOYERS,                                                
                              DAN L. EATON, NAPOLEONE FERRARA, SHERMAN FONG,                                                      
                             WEI-QIANG GAO, AUDREY GODDARD, PAUL J. GODOWSKI,                                                     
                      J. CHRISTOPHER GRIMALDI, AUSTIN L. GURNEY, KENNETH J. HILLAN,                                               
                    JAMES PAN, NICHOLAS F. PAONI, MARGARET ANN ROY, VICTORIA SMITH,                                               
                          TIMOTHY A. STEWART, DANIEL TUMAS, COLIN K. WATANABE,                                                    
                                     P. MICKEY WILLIAMS, and WILLIAM  I. WOOD                                                     
                                                         ____________                                                             
                                                     Appeal No. 2006-2892                                                         
                                                  Application No. 10/012,237                                                      
                                                         ____________                                                             
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                         ____________                                                             

                   Before MILLS, GRIMES, and LINCK,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                   LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                          This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the final rejection of all                      
                   of the pending claims in Application No. 10/012,237, filed December 7, 2001.1  We                              
                   affirm.                                                                                                        


                                                                                                                                 
                   1 The real party in interest is Genentech, Inc.  There is a priority claim dating back to                      
                   September 9, 1998.                                                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013