The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEVIN P. BAKER, DAVID BOTSTEIN, LUC DESNOYERS,
DAN L. EATON, NAPOLEONE FERRARA, SHERMAN FONG,
WEI-QIANG GAO, AUDREY GODDARD, PAUL J. GODOWSKI,
J. CHRISTOPHER GRIMALDI, AUSTIN L. GURNEY, KENNETH J. HILLAN,
JAMES PAN, NICHOLAS F. PAONI, MARGARET ANN ROY, VICTORIA SMITH,
TIMOTHY A. STEWART, DANIEL TUMAS, COLIN K. WATANABE,
P. MICKEY WILLIAMS, and WILLIAM I. WOOD
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2892
Application No. 10/012,237
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MILLS, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of all
of the pending claims in Application No. 10/012,237, filed December 7, 2001.1 We
affirm.
1 The real party in interest is Genentech, Inc. There is a priority claim dating back to
September 9, 1998.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013