Appeal 2006-2937
Application 09/840,188
With respect to dependent claim 20 and dependent claim 30 and
claims grouped therewith at page 19 of the Brief, Appellant merely
relies upon the earlier stated arguments and does not set forth a
separate argument for patentability. Therefore, we will group these
claims with the identified claims. Since we did not find those earlier
arguments persuasive, we do not find the arguments persuasive here.
Therefore, Appellant's arguments are not persuasive, and we will
sustain the rejection of dependent claims 20 and 30 and those grouped
therewith at page 19 of the Brief.
18
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013