Ex Parte Yatka et al - Page 2

                Appeal No. 2006-3009                                                                              
                Application 10/712,114                                                                            

                Mr. Hawthorne further informed Mr. Shurtz that therefore, the Oral Hearing                        
                scheduled for January 11, 2007, will be vacated.                                                  
                       Accordingly, as counsel was informed on January 10, 2007, it is                            
                ORDERED that the Oral Hearing scheduled for 1:00 PM on January 11,                                
                2007, is VACATED.                                                                                 
                                ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER                                                   
                       We remand the application to the Examiner for consideration and                            
                explanation of the issues raised by the record.  37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1)                          
                (2006); Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1211 (8th ed.,                              
                Rev. 5, August 2006).                                                                             
                       The record shows that Appellants cite three non-patent literature                          
                references in the Evidence Appendix and provide copies of these documents                         
                in the Brief filed March 20, 2006 (Br., 14, “Appendix A,” “Appendix B,”                           
                and “Appendix C”).  Appellants do not state in the Evidence Appendix that                         
                these references were previously made of record by the Examiner.                                  
                Appellants rely on these references in arguments (Br., e.g., 7-8 and 10).                         
                       The record further shows that Appellants appended the same                                 
                references and submitted arguments based thereon in the Amendment filed                           
                February 6, 2006, in response to the Final Action mailed November 3, 2005.                        
                The Examiner refused entry of this Amendment in the Advisory Action                               
                mailed February 14, 2006.                                                                         
                       37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(ix) (2006) states in pertinent part:                               
                       An appendix containing . . . evidence entered by the examiner                              
                       and relied upon by appellant in the appeal, along with a                                   
                       statement setting forth where in the record that evidence was                              
                       entered in the record by the examiner.  Reference to unentered                             


                                                        2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013