Ex Parte Ozawa - Page 3


                Appeal 2006-3013                                                                                   
                Application 10/367,849                                                                             

                       Hashimoto                  US 6,295,043 B1            Sep. 25, 2001                         
                       The additional references we rely upon are:                                                 
                Johannes Adam, New Correlations Between Electrical Current and                                     
                Temperature Rise in PCB Traces, 20th IEEE SEMI-THERM Symposium,                                    
                2004, available at                                                                                 
                http://www.flomerics.com/flotherm/technical_papers/t341.pdf                                        
                Web-based document PCB Trace, HardwareBook (HwB), at                                               
                www.hardwarebook.info/PCB_trace (providing data tables for circuit board                           
                trace width).                                                                                      
                                           REJECTIONS AT ISSUE                                                     

                       Claims 14, 31, and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                            
                being unpatentable over Dingwall in view of Kawaguchi.  The Examiner’s                             
                rejection is on pages 3 and 4 of the Answer.                                                       
                       Claims 15, 22, and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                            
                being unpatentable over Dingwall in view of Kawaguchi and Ota.  The                                
                Examiner’s rejection is on pages 4 and 5 of the Answer.                                            
                       Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                  
                unpatentable over Dingwall in view of Kawaguchi, Ota and Hashimoto.  The                           
                Examiner’s rejection is on page 5 of the Answer.                                                   
                       Claims 17 through 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                             
                being unpatentable over Dingwall in view of Kawaguchi, Ota, Holmberg and                           
                Hashimoto.  The Examiner’s rejection is on page 6 of the Answer.                                   




                                                        3                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013