onecle

Ex Parte Jung et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                        Ex parte CLEMENS JUNG, PETER SCHWARZWELLER,                                            
                               KONRAD PETRY, and REINHOLD BALTES                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2006-3025                                                 
                                           Application 10/714,110                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: March 29, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                    
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                       
                LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
                GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 2, 8-                    
                10, and 12-20, the only claims pending in this application.  We have                           
                jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C.  6(b).                                     
                      Appellants’ invention relates to a method of cleaning dishes.  The                       
                necessary cleaning temperature and length of cleaning operation are derived                    
                from the turbidity of the rinsing liquid and solubility of the soiling of the                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013