The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DARIN GLENN, HERB JOHNSON,
RAND DANNENBERG, PETER A. SIECK,
and JOE COUNTRYWOOD
____________
Appeal 2006-3048
Application 10/355,018
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: March 6, 2007
____________
Before CHUNG K. PAK, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 18, 20 through
23, and 25 through 28, all of the claims pending in the above-identified
application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013