The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN M. TREASE
____________
Appeal 2006-3055
Application 10/440,124
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: February 28, 2007
____________
Before TERRY J. OWENS, ROBERT E. NAPPI and LINDA E. HORNER,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Appellant seeks our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) of the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-10. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b) (2002).
SUMMARY OF DECISION
We REVERSE and REMAND the application to the Examiner pursuant to
37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1) for further consideration of the claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013