Appeal 2006-3057
Application 10/426,905
1 CONCLUSION OF LAW
2 On the record before us, Appellants have shown that the Examiner has
3 erred in rejecting claims 1-16 and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
4 anticipated by Rashid, and has erred in rejecting claim 17 under 35 U.S.C.
5 § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Rashid in view of Salmonowicz.
6
7 DECISION
8 The Examiner's rejection of claims 1-17 and 31 is reversed.
9
10 REVERSED
11
12
13 jlb
14
15 Kathryn A. Marra
16 General Motors Corporation
17 Legal Staff, Mail Code 482-C23-B21
18 P.O. Box 300
19 Detroit, MI 48265-3000
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013