Ex Parte Fraki et al - Page 8

             Appeal Number: 2006-3073                                                                          
             Application Number: 10/033,151                                                                    



                                               CONCLUSION                                                      
                To summarize,                                                                                  
                • The rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5 through 7, 9 through 12, 14 through                   
                   21, 23, 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Filler and Yu is                 
                   sustained.                                                                                  
                • The rejection of claim 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Filler, Yu                 
                   and Beuk is sustained.                                                                      
                • The rejection of claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Filler,                   
                   Yu and Peppel is sustained.                                                                 
                • The rejection of claims 8 and 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                    
                   Filler, Yu and Treyz is sustained.                                                          
                • The rejection of claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Filler,                   
                   Yu and Atsmon is sustained.                                                                 














                                                       8                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013