The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JED E. ROSE, FREDERIQUE M. BEHM, JUSTIN P. ROSE,
ANDREW M. ROSE, and ANTHONY E. ROSE
____________
Appeal 2006-3079
Application 10/708,033
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: May 30, 2007
____________
Before TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Jed E. Rose et al. (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-27. We have jurisdiction over this
appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6 (2002).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013