onecle

Ex Parte Keohane et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for               
               publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                            _______________                                                 
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                            _______________                                                 
                   Ex parte SUSANN MARIE KEOHANE, GERALD FRANCIS MCBREARTY,                                 
                         SHAWN PATRICK MULLEN, JESSICA KELLEY MURILLO,                                      
                                     and JOHNNY MENG-HAN SHIEH                                              
                                            _______________                                                 
                                           Appeal No. 2006-3121                                             
                                         Application No. 10/165,083                                         
                                            _______________                                                 
                                                ON BRIEF                                                    
                                            _______________                                                 

               Before RUGGIERO, BARRY, and MACDONALD Administrative Patent Judges.                          
               MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                       
               examiner’s rejection of claims 1-10, 17-25, and 29-34, which constitute all the              
               claims pending in this application.                                                          
               The disclosed invention pertains to providing source information (i.e.,                      
               information that identifies the source of text or other objects, such as copyright or        
               authorship information) pertaining to an object originating from a first document            
               and incorporating the source information into a second document automatically.               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013