1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
2 is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte STEVEN D. CULHANE
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2006-3161
15 Application 10/687,228
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: August 30, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E.
23 HORNER Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
32 of claims 10 to 19. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
33 Appellant invented a garment to be worn by a human being
34 (Specification 1).
35
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013