Ex Parte Hackman et al - Page 2

            Appeal 2006-3201                                                        
            Application 10/689,951                                                  
            1.  A cryogenic fluid distribution device, comprising:                  
                 a fluid flow passage for distributing cryogenic fluid to           
            an apparatus;                                                           
                 an overflow passage positioned downstream of the                   
            apparatus; and                                                          
                 a sensor coupled to the overflow passage, the sensor               
            having an active component for determining if fluid is present          
            in the overflow passage.                                                
                                    THE REFERENCES                                  
            Maric                         5,142,874       Sep.  1, 1992             
            McCulloch et al. (McCulloch)  6,016,697       Jan. 25, 2000             
            Sillat1                       44 20 621 A1    Dec. 22, 1994             
                 (German patent)                                                    
                                    THE REJECTIONS                                  
                 The claims stand rejected as follows: claims 1, 6-11,              
            13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Sillat;            
            claims 2 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Sillat in         
            view of McCulloch; claims 3 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
            obvious over Sillat in view of Maric; and claim 5 under                 
            35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Sillat in view of Maric                 
            and McCulloch.                                                          
                                        OPINION                                     
                 We affirm the rejection of claims 1 and 6-11 and reverse           
            the rejections of claims 2-5 and 12-14.                                 

                                                                                   
            1 Citations herein to Sillat are to the English translation             
            thereof which is of record.                                             
                                           2                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013