onecle

Ex Parte Hoglund et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                             
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                    ____________                                                          
                Ex parte ALBERT HÖGLUND, KIMMO HÄTÖNEN, and ANTTI SORVARI                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                                  Appeal 2006-3245                                                        
                                               Application 10/383,224                                                     
                                               Technology Center 3600                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                               Decided:  March 6, 2007                                                    
                                                     ___________                                                          
              Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR and LINDA E.                                                   
              HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                       
              HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        


                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          

                                           STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                          
                     Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) of the Examiner’s                            
              final rejection of claims 1-10.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).                        






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013