onecle

Ex Parte Janko et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                 for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                 

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                                ____________                                                 
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                ____________                                                 
                           Ex parte BOZIDAR JANKO and KAMALESH PATEL                                         
                                                ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal 2006-3266                                               
                                           Application 10/418,405                                            
                                           Technology Center 3600                                            
                                                ____________                                                 
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                ____________                                                 
                Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W.                                    
                FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                                        STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Janko and Patel (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                     
                Examiner's final rejection of claim 1.  Claim 2 has been objected to by the                  
                Examiner.                                                                                    
                      Appellants' invention relates to a method of displaying video signal                   
                errors in the area of viewer significance in a picture representing the video                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013