The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PING CHANG, GREGG WALLACE, RUSSELL J. HILL,
CRIS KRONEBERGER, and P.A. JOEL SMITH
____________
Appeal 2006-3307
Application 10/102,351
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: April 27, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
We remand the application to the Examiner for further consideration
and explanation of issues raised by the record. 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1)
(2006).
On January 04, 2006, the Appellants filed an Appeal Brief, including
an Evidence Appendix identifying, inter alia, a “Japanese Patent 05326507
to Sato et al.,” including an English language translation thereof, as evidence
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013