1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte ROSETH STEVEN H.
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2006-3311
15 Application 10/392,525
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: May 18, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before TEDDY S. GRON, JAMESON LEE, and JAMES T. MOORE,
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29 STATEMENT OF CASE
30 The Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final
31 rejection of claims 1, 5, 7-11, and 13-15. We have jurisdiction under 35
32 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
33 The Appellant claims a reclosable food container which is made from
34 a single blank. A representative independent claim under appeal reads as
35 follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013