Ex Parte Muzumura - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-3312                                                                              
                Application 09/816,774                                                                        
                                             INTRODUCTION                                                     
                      The subject matter on appeal relates to a lubricating member for use in                 
                the lubrication of rolling bearing, linear motion devices (ball screw, linear                 
                guide, etc.) or the like for food-processing equipment (Specification 1:5-8).                 
                Conventionally, such lubricating members include a base resin and a                           
                lubricant (Specification 1:9 to 2:3).  While the materials are selected to be                 
                non-toxic, at high operating temperatures the base resin may be eluted from                   
                the lubricating member and become harmful to human beings (Specification                      
                2:3-6).  The claims are directed to a process of operating the lubricating                    
                member at temperatures low enough to prevent elution of the resin.  Claim 1                   
                is illustrative:                                                                              
                             1.  A method of using a lubricating member for food-processing                   
                      equipment, said method comprising:                                                      
                             preparing a food-processing equipment lubricating member                         
                      made of a polyolefin resin and a lubricant; and                                         
                             using said lubricating member at a temperature in the range                      
                      from the pour point of said lubricant to not higher than 70ēC.                          
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                       
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                ASO (as translated) JP 10-36875    Feb. 10, 1998                                              
                YABE   US 6,119,813   Sep. 19, 2000                                                           
                      The Examiner rejects claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                             
                unpatentable over either Yabe or Aso.1                                                        
                      We affirm substantially for the reasons advanced by the Examiner in                     
                the Answer and add the following primarily for emphasis.                                      
                                                                                                             
                1 The Examiner and Appellant refer to Aso as JP ‘875.                                         

                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013