Ex Parte Su - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                         Ex parte NAN-YAO SU                                               
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2006-3332                                               
                                         Application 10/161,519                                            
                                         Technology Center 3600                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                         Decided: June 12, 2007                                            
                                              ____________                                                 


               Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and                                       
               JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 

                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                      Nan-Yao Su (Appellant) appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the                        
               Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 4-13, and 15-22.  Claims 3 and 14                
               have been canceled.  We have jurisdiction over this appeal under 35 U.S.C.                  
                6 (2002).                                                                                 




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013