onecle

Ex Parte Newton - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board                                     
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                         ____________________                                                
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                         ____________________                                                
                                       Ex parte GLORIA NEWTON                                                
                                         ____________________                                                
                                             Appeal 2006-3343                                                
                                          Application 10/372,564                                             
                                         Technology Center 3600                                              
                                         ____________________                                                
                                          Decided:  June 20, 2007                                            
                                         ____________________                                                
                Before  RICHARD E. SCHAFER, ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON and                                       
                JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                
                MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
           1                                                                                                 
           2                             STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
           3          The Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C.  134 (2002) from a final                        
           4    rejection of claims 1 to 20.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b)                    
           5    (2002).                                                                                      
           6          The Appellant claims a fitted fabric pet bed mattress cover.                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013