onecle

Ex Parte Hirzel - Page 1



                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                            
                                          is not  binding precedent of the Board.                                                   


                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                         ___________                                                                
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                         ___________                                                                
                                              Ex parte ANDREW D. HIRZEL                                                             
                                                         ___________                                                                
                                                      Appeal 2006-3366                                                              
                                                   Application 10/864,041                                                           
                                                  Technology Center 2800                                                            
                                                         ___________                                                                
                                                   Decided: July 31, 2007                                                           
                                                         ___________                                                                

                        Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and                                                                
                        ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
                        DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner's                                      
                   final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-10, and 12-20 .  Claims 7 and 11 have been                                      
                   canceled.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).  An Oral Hearing                                         
                   was held on July 10, 2007.                                                                                       
                           We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                                       




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013