onecle

Ex Parte Wilfer et al - Page 1




                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                             ____________                                                 
                      Ex parte KURT WILFER and ALEXANDER STEINKOGLER                                      
                                             ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal 2006-3398                                               
                                         Application 10/132,199                                           
                                        Technology Center 3600                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                        Decided:  March 21, 2007                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
            Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E.                                     
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                

                                     STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                
                  Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C.  134 of the Examiner’s                      
            rejection of claims 1 and 17.  The Examiner also rejected claims 2-16 and 18-30               
            (Non-Final Office Action, mailed February 2, 2005), but Appellants have not                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013