The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KURT WILFER and ALEXANDER STEINKOGLER
____________
Appeal 2006-3398
Application 10/132,199
Technology Center 3600
____________
Decided: March 21, 2007
____________
Before MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and LINDA E.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1 and 17. The Examiner also rejected claims 2-16 and 18-30
(Non-Final Office Action, mailed February 2, 2005), but Appellants have not
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013