Ex Parte Vargas et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                 Ex parte JAIME VARGAS, STEPHEN A. YENCHO, JAMEY NIELSEN,                                    
                        MICHAEL HENDRICKSEN, and BERNARD A. HAUSEN                                           
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2006-3416                                                
                                          Application 10/884,751                                             
                                          Technology Center 3700                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                       Decided:  September 13, 2007                                          
                                               ____________                                                  
            Before TERRY J. OWENS, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,                                    
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013