Ex Parte Mitrovic et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0030                                                                              
                Application 10/359,557                                                                        
                      Appellants’ disclosed invention relates to a device and system for                      
                generating and controlling a plasma formed in a capacitively coupled plasma                   
                system having a plasma electrode and a bias electrode formed by a                             
                workpiece support member.  The plasma electrode has a unitary structure                       
                with multiple regions defined by a plurality of RF power feed lines and the                   
                RF power delivered to the feed lines.                                                         
                      We affirm.                                                                              
                      Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and it reads as follows:                       
                   1. An electrode apparatus for use in plasma processing, comprising:                        
                         a) a unitary electrode arranged within a plasma chamber;                             
                         b) a radio frequency (RF) power supply; and                                          
                         c) a RF multiplexer electrically connected to said RF power                          
                             supply and to a plurality of locations on said unitary electrode                 
                             via a corresponding plurality of RF feed lines to establish a                    
                             plurality of electrode regions corresponding to said plurality of                
                             RF feed lines, wherein power is capacitively coupled to the                      
                             plasma within the plasma chamber.                                                
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                       
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                Ishii    US 6,024,827  Feb. 15, 2000                                                          
                Denholm   US 6,101,971  Aug. 15, 2000                                                         
                                                                   (filed Dec. 22, 1998)                      
                Murata    US 6,363,881 B2  Apr. 2, 2002                                                       
                                                                   (filed Jan. 19, 1999)                      
                      Claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 27, and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                         
                § 102(e) as being anticipated by Murata.  Claims 3, 5, and 8-11 stand                         
                rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness, the                           



                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013