Appeal 2007-0058
Application 10/713,600
ANALYSIS
Appellants contend that Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-
6 under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). Reviewing the findings of facts cited
above, we conclude that Examiner has erred in rejecting these claims
under Wood, as an essential element of the independent claim 1 is
missing from the reference.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we
conclude that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-6. The
rejection of those claims is reversed.
DECISION
The Examiner's rejection of claims 1-6 is Reversed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013