The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD I. SUN, RAMIN HEYDARPOUR,
KARL JOSEPHY, JOHANNES SCHUT, ENG-PI CHANG,
and YAO-FENG WANG
____________
Appeal 2007-0061
Application 09/531,978
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 16, 2007
____________
Before PETER F. KRATZ, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s
decision rejecting claims 56-69 and 76-87. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013