The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL T. SPENCER,
THOMAS R. ADAMS, RICHARD J. DAINES, WILLIAM J. GORDON-KAMM,
ALBERT P. KAUSCH, PEGGY G. LEMAUX, CATHERINE J. MACKEY,
MARY L. MANGANO, and THOMAS B. RICE
__________
Appeal No. 2007-0082
Application No. 10/171,498
Technology Center 1600
__________
Decided: September 25, 2007
__________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, DONALD E. ADAMS, and DEMETRA J. MILLS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
MILLS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The Appellant appeals the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims directed to
seed of a fertile, transgenic maize plant as obvious over the prior art. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2006).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013