onecle

Ex Parte Morales - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                     
                  for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                  ____________                                                   
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                  ____________                                                   
                                      Ex parte AZORIDES R. MORALES                                               
                                                  ____________                                                   
                                                Appeal 2007-0099                                                 
                                             Application 10/260,443                                              
                                            Technology Center 3700                                               
                                                  ____________                                                   
                                           HEARD:  January 11, 2007                                              
                                                  ____________                                                   
                Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and ANITA                                            
                PELLMAN GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                     
                GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                       This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of                       
                claims 13, 15, and 21 through 23.                                                                
                       Appellant's invention relates to a pathology grossing tool with two                       
                arrays of sharp tines.  The gap between the two arrays is set for the desired                    
                thickness of the tissue slices to be cut using the grossing tool.   Claim 13 is                  
                illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013